https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/17771
Title: | 《莊子》的挑戰:論郭象如何詮釋《莊子》 Challenging Chuang-Tzu :A Study on Kuo-Hsiang's Interpretation of Chuang-Tzu |
Authors: | 申晏羽 Shen, Yen-Yu |
Keywords: | 郭象;莊子注;經典詮釋;詮釋學;注釋方法;寄言;無對;Kuo-Hsiang;Commentary on Chuang-Tzu;Classics Interpretation;Hermeneutics;Methods of Commentary;Implicit Contents;Non-opposite | Issue Date: | 2015 | Abstract: | 本論文不同於一般學術史的研究,不從外在的學術發展或思想源流探討郭象的《莊子注》,而是單純從《莊子》文本的內部考察郭象注釋《莊子》的方法及其意義。 本論文第一章,討論問題意識與研究方法。筆者認為,如果想深入了解郭象為何會作出這樣的注釋,就必須了解「郭象眼中的《莊子》」為何;只有儘可能站在郭象的角度設想,才能明白他如何閱讀《莊子》,進而體悟他如此作注的理由何在。 本論文第二章,討論郭象的「寄言解讀法」。「寄言」,郭象用以說明不可將《莊子》中的某些內容信以為真,而當察其寫作之意圖何在,才能得到真正的「莊生之旨」。郭象將《莊子》一書中比較荒誕無稽的內容、及批判聖人的內容,視為「寄言」,並透過三種解讀模式的交互使用,指出《莊子》之本旨並非出世思想,亦非詆譭聖人,而是「涉俗蓋世」之談。 本論文第三章,討論郭象的「詭辭辨證法」。「詭辭」,指的是不合乎一般邏輯常識的語言表達方式。郭象認為,《莊子》之所以運用「詭辭」進行寫作,是以解消二元對立的思維為目的,以期讀者領悟「無對」的思維,以實現一「萬物獨化」的和諧世界。 本論文第四章,討論郭象的「篇章統貫法」。《莊子》一書共有三十三個篇章,各篇主題不同,有些內容亦有衝突存在;郭象為了解消這些可能存在的文意衝突,並將各個主題儘可能縮限為同一主旨,採用了「以莊解莊」的方法,為《莊子》形構出一個首尾完整且環環相扣的思想體系。 本論文第五章,全書綜論,探討「郭象眼中的《莊子》」,作出了三點總結。 This study is different from common studies of Chinese academic history, which discuss Kuo-Hsiang''s Commentary on Chuang-Tzu from the perspectives of Chinese academic development or the origin of thoughts. On the contrary, this study tries to explore the methods and meanings of Kuo-Hsiang''s commentary on Chuang-Tzu within the scope of the text in Chuang-Tzu. The first chapter of this study discusses the research questions and methods. From my point of view, if we want to know why Kuo-Hsiang made such comments on Chuang-Tzu, we have to understand Chuang-Tzu from Kuo-Hsiang''s perspectives. Only by putting ourselves in Kuo-Hsiang''s shoes can we realize the reasons of his commentary on Chuang-Tzu. The second chapter of this study discusses Kuo-Hsiang''s interpretation of the“implicit contents”(chi-yen寄言) in Chuang-Tzu. Kuo-Hsiang argued that parts of the contents in Chuang-Tzu are implicit; therefore, people should understand the intention of Chuang-Tzu''s writing in order to grasp his main ideas. Kuo-Hsiang regarded the contents that seem to be ridiculous, or the contents that criticize saints as the implicit contents in Chuang-Tzu. Through using three types of interpretation models, Kuo-Hsiang indicated that the main idea of Chuang-Tzu is neither to encourage people to become hermits nor to defame saints; on the contrary, it is“to engage in the world and care for people.”(she-su-kai-shih涉俗蓋世) The third chapter of this study discusses Kuo-Hsiang''s dialectics for the paradox in Chuang-Tzu. Paradox signifies the expression that is against logic and common knowledge. Kuo-Hsiang argued that the paradox in Chuang-Tzu is aimed at eliminating binary opposition thinking and anticipating that readers understand the concept of“non-opposite”(wu-tui無對) in order to accomplish a peaceful world that“all things on earth can grow and develop spontaneously.”(wan-wu-tu-hua萬物獨化) The fourth chapter of this study discusses Kuo-Hsiang''s method of integrating the chapters in Chuang-Tzu. There are thirty-three chapters in Chuang-Tzu, and each chapter has a different topic. Besides, conflicts also exist among contents of some chapters. In order to eliminate the existing conflicts and narrow down the topics, Kuo-Hsiang adopted the method of“interpreting Chuang-Tzu in light of the contents in Chuang-Tzu.”(i-chuang-chieh-chuang以莊解莊) He then formed an intact ideology that closely connects one chapter with another in Chuang-Tzu. The last chapter reviews the whole study and discusses Chuang-Tzu from Kuo-Hsiang''s point of view. The study comes to three conclusions in the end. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/271612 | Rights: | 論文公開時間: 2015/7/24 論文使用權限: 同意有償授權(權利金給回饋本人) |
Appears in Collections: | 中國文學系 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-R00121018-1.pdf | 23.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.